Strategic Calm in a Turbulent Pacific: How the Trump–Xi Deal Reframes Global Trade Dynamics
By Dr Mohd Safar Hasim
What began as a quiet recalibration in Washington with Australia has now culminated in a sweeping moment of economic détente in Busan, South Korea.
The limited but symbolically potent trade agreement between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping marks the most significant thaw in US–China relations since the tariff wars began.
Though the deal is only valid for one year, its implications ripple far beyond its duration. In a world rattled by supply chain shocks, tech bans, and geopolitical uncertainty, even a temporary truce is a geopolitical balm — and the world, long bracing for escalation, can finally exhale.
The Road to Busan: Strategic Stops and Shifting Alliances
The journey to this moment was anything but linear. It began with a series of bilateral and regional engagements that quietly reshaped the Indo-Pacific landscape.
* Washington–Canberra: The US–Australia pact on critical minerals and Indo-Pacific defence cooperation laid the groundwork for a broader coalition. By securing Australian lithium and rare earths, Washington signalled its intent to diversify away from Chinese supply chains.
* Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand signed trilateral agreements with the US on supply chain resilience, digital trade, and green energy. These deals reinforced ASEAN’s strategic centrality and offered Washington a softer landing in Southeast Asia, where China’s influence remains strong but not unchallenged.
* Tokyo; Seoul: Japan reaffirmed semiconductor alignment with Washington, while South Korea negotiated a high-stakes investment-for-tariff deal. Seoul’s proposal to invest US$350 billion in US-designated sectors—semiconductors, shipbuilding, biotech — was met with cautious optimism, though talks remain entangled over payment structures and profit-sharing.
Each stop was a chess move. But the final play — with China — was the most unexpected, and arguably the most consequential.
The “Sweeter” Deal with China
Despite years of economic sparring, the Trump–Xi agreement delivered a package that was immediate, tangible, and globally stabilising:
1. Rare Earth Supply Agreement
China will continue exporting critical rare earth minerals to the US for one year, including gallium and dysprosium — essential for semiconductors, EVs, and defence tech. This agreement is renewable annually and seen as a breakthrough amid escalating export control threats.
2. Tariff Reductions
The US will cut tariffs on Chinese goods from 57% to 47%. Trump also reduced fentanyl-related tariffs from 20% to 10%, in exchange for China’s pledge to curb precursor chemical exports. This move supports US public health efforts while easing inflationary pressure.
3. Agricultural Trade
China resumed large-scale purchases of US soybeans, a key win for American farmers and a gesture of goodwill that echoes earlier trade cycles.
4. TikTok; Tech Talks
A framework deal on TikTok’s US operations was discussed, with further details expected in coming months. Broader tech cooperation remains limited due to ongoing export bans and intellectual property concerns.
5. Diplomatic Engagement
Trump and Xi plan reciprocal state visits in 2026 —Trump to China in April, Xi to the US later in the year. These visits signal a willingness to maintain dialogue despite strategic rivalry.
Global Reaction: From Anxiety to Opportunity
Markets surged. Diplomats recalibrated. Crypto traders speculated. And civic educators, like us, now have a clearer lens to explain the shifting tides.
The deal sparked cautious optimism across global markets. Chinese equities rallied, US agricultural futures stabilised, and ASEAN currencies strengthened slightly. Even Bitcoin saw a speculative bump, as traders interpreted the deal as a signal of reduced geopolitical risk.
For Southeast Asia, the deal offers breathing room. Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand — each navigating their own balancing acts between Washington and Beijing — now have space to pursue regional integration without immediate pressure to choose sides.
Strategic Outlook: A Truce, not a Treaty
This is a temporary truce, not a full-scale reset. The deeper issues—semiconductors, AI, Taiwan, cybersecurity—remain unresolved. But the agreement reflects a shared recognition: escalation benefits no one.
For the US:
* Pros: Stabilises supply chains, supports agriculture, and cools inflationary pressures.
* Cons: Leaves deeper tech and security disputes unresolved. Critics may argue the deal lacks enforcement teeth.
For China:
* Pros: Avoids escalation, maintains export access, and signals diplomatic flexibility.
* Cons: Still faces scrutiny over AI, chips, and strategic industries. The one-year term limits long-term planning.
For ASEAN and the Global South:
* The deal reduces volatility and offers a window for regional diplomacy. Countries like Malaysia can now focus on green energy transitions, digital trade, and civic education without the shadow of superpower confrontation.
Why This Moment Matters
For civic educators, policy analysts, and outreach strategists, this moment is rich with teachable insights. It illustrates how diplomacy, even when imperfect, can stabilise markets, ease public anxieties, and create space for constructive engagement.
It also underscores the importance of regional agency. Malaysia’s role in facilitating trilateral agreements, Vietnam’s digital trade pivot, and Thailand’s green energy commitments show that middle powers can shape outcomes—not just react to them.
And finally, it reminds us that clarity matters. In a world of fast-moving headlines and geopolitical noise, structured commentary and bilingual outreach can empower communities to understand, engage, and act.
The views expressed here are entirely those of Dr Mohd Safar Hasim, a Council Member of the Malaysian Press Institute (MPI)
WE